> Michal, if you think crashing processes is an acceptable alternative to error handling _you have no business writing kernel code_.
> You have been stridently arguing for one bad idea after another, and it's an insult to those of us who do give a shit about writing reliable software.
> You're arguing against basic precepts of kernel programming.
> Get your head examined. And get the fuck out of here with this shit.
You big meanie so we won’t take your FREE LABOUR THAT BENEFITS US all? What matter of mental illness is this? We’ll punish you voluntarily giving us free labour by not taking it? This is from the same series as “I’ll piss off the lottery people by not accepting my winnings”?
the offending message seems to say:
> Michal, if you think crashing processes is an acceptable alternative to error handling _you have no business writing kernel code_.
> You have been stridently arguing for one bad idea after another, and it's an insult to those of us who do give a shit about writing reliable software.
> You're arguing against basic precepts of kernel programming.
> Get your head examined. And get the fuck out of here with this shit.
You big meanie so we won’t take your FREE LABOUR THAT BENEFITS US all? What matter of mental illness is this? We’ll punish you voluntarily giving us free labour by not taking it? This is from the same series as “I’ll piss off the lottery people by not accepting my winnings”?
What would you propose as punishments for CoC violations like these?